Lung Transplant Research - Risks, Prognosis, Procedure, Surgery, Organ Donation

Lung Transplant Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Lung Transplant, including details on risks, prognosis, procedure, surgery, organ donation.


Lung Transplant Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Lung Transplant

Books on Lung Transplant

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Air trapping: comparison of standard-dose and simulated low-dose thin-section CT techniques.

Bankier AA, Schaefer-Prokop C, De Maertelaer V, Tack D, Jaksch P, Klepetko W, Gevenois PA

Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. alexander.bankier@meduniwien.ac.at

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the effect of radiation dose reduction on the visual quantification of air trapping at expiratory thin-section computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this ethical committee-approved study, 27 lung transplant recipients (12 women, 15 men; mean age, 54 years +/- 2 [standard error of the mean]) underwent expiratory thin-section CT at 140 kVp and 80 mAs (effective). All patients gave written informed consent. Dose reduction corresponding to 60, 40, and 20 mAs (effective) was simulated. The extent of air trapping in both original and dose-reduced studies was scored by three independent readers. The effects of tube current-time product, reader, reading session, and body mass index on average air trapping scores were assessed with analysis of variance. Agreements between and within observers were assessed with a weighted kappa statistic. Subjective scores for diagnostic confidence were attributed (3 = high, 2 = medium, 1 = low), and their means were calculated for each tube current-time product value. RESULTS: No significant effect on average air trapping scores as a result of tube current-time product (P = .222), reader (P = .217), reading session (P = .705), or body mass index (P = .505) could be detected. At 80 mAs, agreement between readers was excellent; agreement decreased to good or moderate at lower tube current settings. Agreement within readers decreased with a decrease in dose but remained good even at 20 mAs. Confidence also decreased, with mean scores decreasing from 2.33 +/- 0.73 (standard deviation) to 1.04 +/- 0.19 when dose decreased. CONCLUSION: At 140 kVp, the tube current-time product can be reduced from 80 to 20 mAs without impairing the visual quantification of air trapping at expiratory thin-section CT and with acceptable decreases in agreement between and within readers and in reader confidence.

Published 27 February 2007 in Radiology, 242(3): 898-906.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Lung Transplant Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Lung Transplant Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Lung Transplant Books

And Then We Danced

And Then We Danced